1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1995 ZAZ Slavuta
To start off, 1995 ZAZ Slavuta is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1995 ZAZ Slavuta. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1995 ZAZ Slavuta.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1995 ZAZ Slavuta | |
Make | Chevrolet | ZAZ |
Model | Camaro | Slavuta |
Year Released | 1982 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.9 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 67 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2330 mm |