1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Kia Capital
To start off, 1996 Kia Capital is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1996 Kia Capital. (114 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1996 Kia Capital.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Kia Capital, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Kia Capital. (152 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Kia Capital.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Kia Capital | |
Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
Model | Camaro | Capital |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2530 mm |