1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Suzuki Esteem
To start off, 1996 Suzuki Esteem is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Esteem. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Esteem.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Esteem, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Esteem. (128 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Esteem.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Suzuki Esteem | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Camaro | Esteem |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 128 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2490 mm |