1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move
To start off, 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move. (171 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1997 Daihatsu Gran Move | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daihatsu |
Model | Camaro | Gran Move |
Year Released | 1982 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 171 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |