1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer (280 HP) has 191 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer (372 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm). This means 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Lancer |
Year Released | 1982 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 372 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |