1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1998 Saturn SL
To start off, 1998 Saturn SL is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1998 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1998 Saturn SL.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Saturn SL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Saturn SL. (159 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1998 Saturn SL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saturn |
Model | Camaro | SL |
Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 159 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |