1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1999 Mahindra CL
To start off, 1999 Mahindra CL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1999 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1999 Mahindra CL.
Because 1999 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1999 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mahindra |
Model | Camaro | CL |
Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2040 mm |