1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1999 Pontiac Salsa
To start off, 1999 Pontiac Salsa is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1999 Pontiac Salsa. (153 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1999 Pontiac Salsa.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Pontiac Salsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Pontiac Salsa. (203 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Pontiac Salsa.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1999 Pontiac Salsa | |
Make | Chevrolet | Pontiac |
Model | Camaro | Salsa |
Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2750 mm |