1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2000 Volkswagen Hac
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Hac is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Hac, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volkswagen Hac (310 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Volkswagen Hac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2000 Volkswagen Hac | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
| Model | Camaro | Hac |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1896 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2520 mm |
