1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2001 Mahindra CL is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2001 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2001 Mahindra CL.
Because 2001 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Mahindra CL | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mahindra |
| Model | Camaro | CL |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2040 mm |
