1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer (382 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (325 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Lancer |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94.9 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 87.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 71 L |