1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2001 Suzuki Covie is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Covie.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki Covie, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (178 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Suzuki Covie | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Camaro | Covie |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1327 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 2950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |