1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Volkswagen Golf

To start off, 2001 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volkswagen Golf (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volkswagen Golf should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Volkswagen Golf. (166 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Volkswagen Golf.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Chevrolet Camaro 2001 Volkswagen Golf
Make Chevrolet Volkswagen
Model Camaro Golf
Year Released 1982 2001
Body Type Coupe Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2835 cc 1982 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 101 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 192 Nm 166 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 2600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4090 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2480 mm