1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Ford Tonka
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 489 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (325 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Ford Tonka | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Camaro | Tonka |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4995 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 814 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 6150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 4200 mm |
