1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Tata Indica
To start off, 2003 Tata Indica is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Tata Indica. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Tata Indica.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Tata Indica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Tata Indica. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Tata Indica.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Tata Indica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Tata |
Model | Camaro | Indica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |