1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
| Model | Camaro | Sable |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 155 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2760 mm |
