1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Minica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2350 mm |