1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2004 Nissan Frontier is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (180 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Frontier. (274 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Frontier.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Camaro | Frontier |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4995 cc | 3278 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 274 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.9 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 83 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 73 L |
