1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Nissan Murano

To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Murano (246 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 2004 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Murano. (323 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Murano.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Chevrolet Camaro 2004 Nissan Murano
Make Chevrolet Nissan
Model Camaro Murano
Year Released 1982 2004
Body Type Coupe Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4995 cc 3507 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 163 HP 246 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 323 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 94.9 mm 95.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.4 mm 81.4 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 80 L