1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero

To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (170 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. (271 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Chevrolet Camaro 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
Make Chevrolet Oldsmobile
Model Camaro Alero
Year Released 1982 2004
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4995 cc 3343 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 163 HP 170 HP
Torque 325 Nm 271 Nm
Engine Bore Size 94.9 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.4 mm 84 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 53 L