1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Subaru Baja
To start off, 2004 Subaru Baja is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Subaru Baja (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Baja should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2004 Subaru Baja is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Baja will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Subaru Baja. (319 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Subaru Baja.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Subaru Baja | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
| Model | Camaro | Baja |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4995 cc | 2458 cc |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.9 mm | 100.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 79 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 64 L |
