1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 163 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Camaro | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4995 cc | 2376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 213 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.9 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 100 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 59 L |
