1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2005 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2005 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 ZAZ Wagon.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Chevrolet | ZAZ |
| Model | Camaro | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.9 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 67 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2330 mm |
