1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Hummer H3
To start off, 2006 Hummer H3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hummer H3 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2006 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Hummer H3. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Hummer H3.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Hummer H3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Hummer |
Model | Camaro | H3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 3457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 87 L |