1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis
To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Ractis. (158 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Ractis.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Toyota Ractis | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Camaro | Ractis |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1299 cc |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
