1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (118 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Camaro | Citi |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |