1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Volvo S80

To start off, 2006 Volvo S80 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Volvo S80. (138 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo S80.

Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volvo S80. (220 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volvo S80.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Chevrolet Camaro 2006 Volvo S80
Make Chevrolet Volvo
Model Camaro S80
Year Released 1982 2006
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4995 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 163 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 220 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 70 L