1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Renault Thalia
To start off, 2009 Renault Thalia is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2009 Renault Thalia. (97 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Thalia.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Thalia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Thalia. (127 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Thalia.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2009 Renault Thalia | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | Thalia |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 97 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2473 mm |