1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2010 Volkswagen Citi

To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen Citi. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen Citi.

Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volkswagen Citi. (117 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volkswagen Citi.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Chevrolet Camaro 2010 Volkswagen Citi
Make Chevrolet Volkswagen
Model Camaro Citi
Year Released 1982 2010
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2835 cc 1423 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 101 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 192 Nm 117 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 3820 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2410 mm