1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7
To start off, 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. In terms of performance, 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7 (237 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7. (265 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2011 Luxgen Luxgen7 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Luxgen |
Model | Camaro | Luxgen7 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 265 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4845 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1876 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1768 mm |