1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2013 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher.
Because 2013 Suzuki SX4 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Suzuki SX4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2013 Suzuki SX4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Camaro | SX4 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |