1982 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 3,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Caprice.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Caprice | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
Model | Caprice | TL |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3753 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2840 mm |