1982 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. (333 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Caprice | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Caprice | E-350 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5002 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 333 Nm | 475 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3510 mm |