1982 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2006 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2006 Toyota Tundra is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 5,002 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Tundra (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 367 kg more than 2006 Toyota Tundra.

Because 2006 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Tundra (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Caprice. (333 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Caprice.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Chevrolet Caprice 2006 Toyota Tundra
Make Chevrolet Toyota
Model Caprice Tundra
Year Released 1982 2006
Body Type Station Wagon Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5002 cc 3950 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 148 HP 236 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 333 Nm 361 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Weight 1722 kg 1355 kg
Vehicle Length 5460 mm 5550 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1920 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 3270 mm