1982 Chevrolet Citation vs. 2004 Holden UTE
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Citation. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Citation would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 360 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Citation.
Because 2004 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Citation, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Citation | 2004 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Citation | UTE |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2950 mm |