1982 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 11 kg more than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Impala | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Hudson |
| Model | Impala | Super Wasp |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1599 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3030 mm |
