1982 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2000 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Impala | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Impala | Tracker |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2210 mm |