1982 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2000 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2000 Subaru Forester is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 224 kg more than 2000 Subaru Forester.
Because 2000 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Impala | 2000 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Impala | Forester |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2530 mm |