1982 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 150 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Impala | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Impala | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3010 mm |