1982 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 664 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Impala.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Impala | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | Impala | Ram |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 8277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 500 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3030 mm |