1982 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 753 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Impala | 2006 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Impala | Citi |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 857 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2410 mm |