1982 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2008 Ford E-250
To start off, 2008 Ford E-250 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 503 kg more than 2008 Ford E-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Impala | 2008 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Impala | E-250 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1107 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 5520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3510 mm |