1982 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2009 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2009 Renault Trafic is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Trafic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2009 Renault Trafic has manual transmission. 2009 Renault Trafic will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Impala | 2009 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Impala | Trafic |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3100 mm |