1982 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 204 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Impala.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Impala | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
| Model | Impala | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1814 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4666 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2103 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2946 mm |
