1982 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 250 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Impala | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Impala | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1798 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2946 mm |