1982 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 335 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Malibu | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Sunbeam |
Model | Malibu | Tiger |
Year Released | 1982 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2190 mm |