1982 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1969 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 715 kg more than 1969 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Malibu is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1969 Suzuki Fronte has manual transmission. 1969 Suzuki Fronte will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Malibu | 1969 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Malibu | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 785 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2160 mm |
