1982 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1996 Eagle Vision
To start off, 1996 Eagle Vision is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Eagle Vision weights approximately 145 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Malibu is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Malibu | 1996 Eagle Vision | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Eagle |
| Model | Malibu | Vision |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
