1982 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Malibu is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Malibu | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | 5 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 2258 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2760 mm |