1982 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-150 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Malibu is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Malibu | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | E-150 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2824 mm |